And potentially look into raid 0 (i dont know if thats the right raid) (which will definitely increase the speed but if the drive fails, data recovery will not be easy) else just use it as a backup or whatever you please. You can get rid of the cd drive, look for OWC data doubler, that $30 USD hardware allows you to add another hdd/sdd in lew of a cd drive. If you want to go a bite extreme, im assuming the model you has a cd drive. Upload times to youtube is internet bases but having an ssd, will drastically improve render times.
Even though the pro is 10% faster, the price to performance is not worth it. I would go 1TB, if you want to keep some of your files on your laptop Since you are editing videos, your file size may very. While the lack of an optical drive won’t be major imposition for many, the inability to inexpensively add a secondary, high capacity spinning drive is definitely a significant loss in terms of upgradability.Samsung makes the best SSD’s for that specific model. A significant portion of the weight savings in the Retina MacBook Pro comes from Apple’s removal of the optical drive. We love the optical drive in the regular MacBook Pro because we appreciate the additional space given by adding a second hard drive (using one of our SATA enclosures).Incorporating a removable LCD into the MacBook Pro with Retina display would increase the thickness by less than a millimeter, while still preserving the awesome Retina resolution.
Thankfully, users can replace just the LCD instead of the entire assembly.
MID 2012 MACBOOK PRO SSD SIZE CRACKED
While the regular MacBook Pro display may not be Retinalicious, a cracked LCD will still be the most expensive repair (aside from the logic board) on this machine. But, an individual RAM slot is only 4.27 mm thick if the design of the logic board featured the RAM slots side by side (like older MacBooks), folks could still replace their RAM for years to come. Yet the entire Retina MacBook Pro is only 18 mm thick, and allocating half of that dimension to RAM slots would be a big sacrifice. While the individual RAM modules are thin (~3.15 mm), the “stacked” RAM slots in the regular MacBook Pro are a whopping 9.15 mm thick. But the SSD is one of the few things that is actually removable from the Retina version, and Apple could use a non-proprietary mSATA connector so folks could replace the drive with an off-the-shelf unit. Here’s a big difference: the regular MacBook Pro 2.5″ SATA hard drive is 9.45 mm thick, compared to 3.16 mm for the SSD found in the Retina Display MacBook Pro. It would’ve taken some engineering, but Apple could expand the frame in the Retina MacBook Pro to encompass the whole battery, and allow it to come out as a singular, non-glued unit. Although the discrepancy is large between the two battery thicknesses, the Retina MacBook Pro’s battery is spread out over a much larger surface area. The MacBook Pro with Retina Display’s battery varies in thickness from 5.25 mm to 8.60 mm depending on which cell you measure, and it has a plastic frame around some of the cells. It’s the same size as well, a solid 13.8 mm in thickness. The battery is exactly the same capacity as last year’s model: 77.5 Wh at 10.95 V. This is a no-brainer in our books-there’s absolutely no benefit from using a proprietary pentalobe screw type in any electronic device, aside from keeping users out of it. The regular MacBook Pro is always cited first, compared to the MacBook Pro with Retina Display: Comparison highlights between the two machines below.
0 kommentar(er)
